NEW!   Follow YARN on Instagram New Stuff, Yummies

Missing a fave video? Suggest a film, show or song! Click to email us!

Find old favorites and new gems in clips to explore

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

1.4s

small percentage decreases in the firing rate.

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

2.3s

Replicators on Deck 15 require service.

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

2.8s

I had to lower an emergency containment field.

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

1.8s

essential functions on one or more decks.

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

1.2s

with the aft corridor on Deck 17.

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

2s

Have personnel moved and seal those decks.

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

1.5s

She registered the problem on Deck 17

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

1.9s

hull breaches on Decks 15 and 16,

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

2s

No, no, no, no, no.

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

1.3s

BRYCE: I'm getting reports-- Decks 12 through 15

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

2.6s

It didn't. Oxygen levels on mess hall, Deck Five,

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

2.2s

the replicator on Deck Five will fail in three minutes...

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

1.8s

No.

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

1.9s

No.

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

3s

I can detect something unusual on the exterior hull of Deck 17.

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

1.7s

Rather than some part of my subconscious.

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

1.4s

There's no irregularities.

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

1.6s

No data yet.

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

2.8s

No. Something's happening.

Star Trek: Discovery (2017) - S04E06 Stormy Weather

1s

No, it's not.